Figures
From GARDGuide
- 1.0 The Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide
- 2.0 The Acid Rock Drainage Process
- 3.0 Corporate, Regulatory, and Community Framework
- 4.0 Defining the Problem – Characterization
- 5.0 Prediction
- 6.0 Prevention And Mitigation
- 7.0 Drainage Treatment
- 8.0 Monitoring
- 9.0 Acid Rock Drainage Management and Performance Assessment
- 10.0 Acid Rock Drainage Communication and Consulting
1.0 The Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide
List of Figures
- Figure 1-1: Types of Drainage Produced by Sulphide Mineral Oxidation
- Figure 1-2: Overall ARD Management Plan
- Figure 1-3: Applying an Environmental Management System to ARD
2.0 The Acid Rock Drainage Process
List of Tables
- Table 2-1: Common Sulphides Known or Inferred to GenerateAcid when Oxidized (Plumlee, 1999)
- Table 2-2: Typical NP Values and pH Buffering Ranges for Some Common Minerals (Jambor, 2003; Blowes et al., 2003; BCAMDTF, 1989)
List of Figures
- Figure 2-1: Roman Portal with Acid Rock Drainage – Spain
- Figure 2-2: Generalized Conceptual Model of Sources, Pathways and Receiving Environment at a Mine or Processing Site
- Figure 2-3: Ficklin Diagram Showing ARD, NMD, and SD as a Function of Dissolved Base Metal Concentrations (Plumlee et al., 1999)
- Figure 2-4: Diagram Showing ARD, NMD, and SD as a Function of Sulphate Concentrations
- Figure 2-5: Ficklin Diagram Showing Selected Principles that Govern Mine Water Quality (Plumlee et al., 1999)
- Figure 2-6: The Global Sulphur Cycle (Stumm and Morgan, 1996). Global Fluxes in Millions Tons of Sulphur per Year and Inventories in Millions Tons of Sulphur
- Figure 2-7: The Biogeochemical Sulphur Cycle
- Figure 2-8: Model for the Oxidation of Pyrite (Stumm and Morgan, 1981). (The numbers in brackets refer to the reactions presented in Section 2.6.4)
- Figure 2-9: Schematic Illustration of Normalized Sulphide Oxidation Rates with and without Bacterial Mediation (Robertson and Broughton, 1992)
- Figure 2-10: Stages in the Formation of ARD (Broughton and Robertson, 1992). (The numbers in brackets refer to the reactions presented in Chapter 2.6.4.)
- Figure 2-11: Schematic Illustration of Factors that Affect Sulphide Oxidation and Modify Mine Drainage during Transport
- Figure 2-12: Schematic Illustration of the Effect of Temperature on Normalized Sulphide Oxidation Rates (Robertson and Broughton, 1992)
- Figure 2-13: Two-Stage Process for Pyrite Oxidation in a Tailings Impoundment (Wunderly et al., 1996)
3.0 Corporate, Regulatory, and Community Framework
List of Tables
- Table 3-1 : Risk Management Procedure for Mine Sites (modified from Lee, 1999)
- Table 3-2: Integrating Risk Approach into ARD/ML Management
List of Figures
- Figure 3-1: Framework for ARD management
- Figure 3-2: Hierarchical relationship between Global, National and Local Elements of the Framework
- Figure 3-3: Conceptual ARD Management Framework
- Figure 3-4: Sustainable Development Balance
4.0 Defining the Problem – Characterization
List of Tables
- Table 4-1: Mine Phase Objectives and Activities
- Table 4-2: Characterization Activities by Mine Phase
- Table 4-3: Source Material Characterization Activities by Mine Phase
- Table 4-4: Geologic Characteristics of Mineral Deposits that Affect Their Environmental Signatures (Plumlee, 1999)
- Table 4-5: Australian Guidance on Sample Numbers (Australian Government Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, 2007)
List of Figures
- Figure 4-1: Characterization Chapter Road Map
- Figure 4-2: Major Steps Involved in Extraction Metallurgy of Metals
- Figure 4-3: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Pit during Operation and Closure
- Figure 4-4: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in Underground Workings during Operation and Closure
- Figure 4-5: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Waste Rock Pile
- Figure 4-6: Sources and Pathways of ARD, NMD, and SD in a Subaqueous Tailings Storage Facility
- Figure 4-7: Typical Data Requirements of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
- Figure 4-8: Source Material Geochemical Testing Program Components
- Figure 4-9: Water Balance Box and Arrow Diagram
5.0 Prediction
List of Tables
- Table 5-1: Methods for Geochemical Characterization
- Table 5-2: Geologists Observations and Logging of Core for ARD Analysis
- Table 5-3: Example Chemistry Table
- Table 5-4: Example ABA
- Table 5-5: AP and NP of > 2 mm and < 2 mm waste rock particle size fractions (from Price, 2010)
List of Figures
- Figure 5-1: Generic Prediction Program Flowchart
- Figure 5-2: Generalized Flowchart for the ARD Prediction Approach at Mine Sites (after Maest and Kuipers, 2005)
- Figure 5-3: Conceptual Model Showing Metal and Acid Source Regions at Iron Mountain and Downstream Transport Pathways to the Sacramento River
- Figure 5-4: Flowchart for Metal and Acid Source Regions at Iron Mountain and Downstream Transport Pathways to the Sacramento River
- Figure 5-5: Schematic Illustration of Geochemical Characterization Program (modified from Maest and Kuipers, 2005)
- Figure 5-6: Example Plot of NP from Total Carbon vs. NP from Modified Sobek
- Figure 5-7: Example Plot of Total Sulphur vs. Sulphide Sulphur
- Figure 5-8: ARD Rock Type Classification Plot Based on ABA and NAG Test
- Figure 5-9: Example Plot of Metal Loadings vs. Sulphate Content
- Figure 5-10: Humidity Cells
- Figure 5-11: Example Plot of Kinetic Test Results
- Figure 5-12: Wall Washing
- Figure 5-13: Test Cells for Waste Rock
- Figure 5-14: Test Plot for Paste Tailings – Somincor Neves Corvo Mine, Portugal
- Figure 5-15: Example of Block Model Use: ARD Potential of Pit Highwall Above Final Pit lake
- Figure 5-16: Example of Block Model Use: ARD Potential of Pit Wall after Cessation of Mining
- Figure 5-17: Molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/SO4 representing sample specific NPR values for two humidity cells
- Figure 5-18: AP versus NP (from Price, 2010)
- Figure 5-19: A decline in drainage pH resulting from the oxidation of ammonium (from Price, 2010)
- Figure 5-20: An initial decline in seepage pH from exchange of cations in neutral mine drainage for H+ in acidic organic soils
- Figure 5-21: Seepage pH versus time at the Island Copper Mine (from Morin and Hutt, 1997)
- Figure 5-22: NNP versus NPR for a Proposed Cu-Au Mine (from Price, 2010)
- Figure 5-23: Decision Tree for the Determination of Acid Generation Potential (AMIRA, 2002)
- Figure 5-24: Example Plot of ABA Results and ARD Criteria
- Figure 5-25: Generalized Model Process
6.0 Prevention And Mitigation
List of Tables
- Table 6-1: Forms of Codisposal
- Table 6-2: Benefits and Considerations of Codisposal
- Table 6-3: Benefits and Limitations of Alkaline Amendments
- Table 6-4: Considerations and Limitations of Soil Covers
- Table 6-5: Benefits and Disadvantages of Synthetic Covers
- Table 6-6: Some Considerations for Subaqueous Disposal
- Table 6-7: Summary of Prevention and Mitigative Measures and Climate Considerations
List of Figures
- Figure 6-1: Options and Effectiveness with Time (TEAM NT, 2004)
- Figure 6-2: Waste Rock Pile Structure and Processes (Wilson, 2008b)
- Figure 6-3: Adaptive Management Approach to Prevention and Mitigation of ARD
- Figure 6-4: Adaptive Management Implementation by Phased Approach
- Figure 6-5: Methods for Prevention and Mitigation of ARD
- Figure 6-6: Coefficient of Diffusion versus Degree of Saturation for Saturated Porous Media (from Aubertin, 2005)
- Figure 6-7: Example Waste Rock Encapsulation Strategy
- Figure 6-8: Flow Chart for the Dry Cover Design Process (adapted from O’Kane and Wels, 2003)
- Figure 6-9: Covers and Climate Types (from Holdridge et al., 1971)
- Figure 6-10: Conceptual Illustration of Processes Affecting Long-Term Performance of Soil Covers (from INAP, 2003)
- Figure 6-11: Sample Soil Covers Designs (from MEND, 2001)
- Figure 6-12: Sample Configurations of Synthetics in Soil Covers
- Figure 6-13: Conceptual Schematic of the Components of a Field Performance Monitoring System (from MEND, 2004a)
- Figure 6-14: Subaqueous Tailings Disposal
- Figure 6-15: Water Cover Processes
- Figure 6-16: State of Solids during Deposition and Consolidation (L); Stage 4 Photo (R)
- Figure 6-17: Schematic Plan View, TSF with Three Depositional Zones
- Figure 6-18: Prevention and Mitigation Evaluation of Alternatives
- Figure 6-19: Comparative Costs for Capillary Barrier Cover (CCBE), Complete and Partial Desulphurization and Water Cover (Bussiere and Wilson, 2006)
7.0 Drainage Treatment
List of Tables
- Table 7-1: Qualitative Comparison of Different Categories of Treatment
- Table 7-2: Alkali Materials and Compounds Applied to ARD Treatment
- Table 7-3: Comparative Table Different HDS Process Configurations
- Table 7-4: Selection Criteria for Lime Neutralization Processes
- Table 7-5: Theoretical Minimum Metal Hydroxide Solubility pH
- Table 7-6: Criteria for Selecting an Appropriate Mine-Water Treatment Desalination Technology
- Table 7-7: Generic Categories of Passive Treatment Systems
- Table 7-8: Postulated Removal Mechanisms of Metals and Mining-related Pollutants in Passive Treatment Systems
List of Figures
- Figure 7-1: Generic Mine Water System Indicating Potential Position for a Drainage Treatment Facility
- Figure 7-2: Generic Range of Drainage Treatment Technologies
- Figure 7-3: Acid Drainage Decision Tree
- Figure 7-4: Basic HDS Process Configuration
- Figure 7-5: Relationship between Flow Rate and Treatment Plant Capital Cost
- Figure 7-6: Integrated Limestone / Lime Neutralization Process
- Figure 7-7: Simplified SAVMIN Process Diagram
- Figure 7-8: Conceptual High Recovery Membrane Desalination Process
- Figure 7-9: Concept SPARRO Process Flow Diagram
- Figure 7-10: Conceptual GYPCIX®ion Exchange Treatment Process
- Figure 7-11: Generic Biological Sulphate Removal Process Configuration
- Figure 7-12: Periodic Table for Passive Treatment
- Figure 7-13: Selection of Passive Treatment Technology Chart
- Figure 7-14: Selection of Passive Treatment Technology Chart
- Figure 7-15: Selected Passive Treatment Components
- Figure 7-16: Anoxic Limestone Drain Design
- Figure 7-17: Profile view of a reducing and alkalinity producing system
8.0 Monitoring
List of Tables
- Table 8-1: Monitoring Sources, Pathways, and Receptors
- Table 8-2: Common ARD Monitoring Components
- Table 8-3: Preliminary Intensive Sampling Program
- Table 8-4: Impact Assessment Sampling Location Designs
- Table 8-5: Monitoring Activity Standard Operating Procedures
- Table 8-6: Components of Waste Rock Pile Monitoring Program
- Table 8-7: Components of Tailings Storage Facility Monitoring Program
- Table 8-8: Aquatic Habitat Information Requirements for Biological Monitoring
List of Figures
- Figure 8-1: Monitoring Chapter Organization
- Figure 8-2: Steps in the Development of an ARD Monitoring Program
- Figure 8-3: Conceptual Risk-Based Approach - Relationships Between the Contaminant Source the Receptor and the Pathway that Connects them
- Figure 8-4: Waste Stockpile Seepage Water Quality Hysteresis
- Figure 8-5: Waste Rock Seepage Water Quality Trends (pH, Alkalinity, SO4, Cu, and Zn)
- Figure 8-6: Spring Thaw Stream Concentration and Loading Trends (March 23 to June 22)
- Figure 8-7: Solute Transport and Thermal Stratification in Lakes
- Figure 8-8: Steps in the Development of a Biological Monitoring Program
List of Photos
- Photo 8-1: Collection of a Wall Washing Sample from a Pit Face
- Photo 8-2: Waste Rock Lysimeter in an Arid Climate
- Photo 8-3: Stream Discharge Monitoring Using a Current Meter
- Photo 8-4: Benthic Macroinvertebrate
- Photo 8-5: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling with a Hess Sampler
- Photo 8-6: Fish Survey Using Nets
9.0 Acid Rock Drainage Management and Performance Assessment
List of Tables
- Table 9-1: Mine Life Cycle Considerations for the Development of ARD Management Plans
- Table 9-2: Technical Disciplines Involved in the Development of an ARD Management Plan
- Table 9-3: FMEA Outcomes Combining Likelihood of Failure and Consequences
- Table 9-4: Monitoring and Performance Assessment of Success
List of Figures
- Figure 9-1: Flowchart for Performance Assessment and Management Review
- Figure 9-2: Hierarchy of Management Tools
- Figure 9-3: Open Pit Bench Plan Developed During the Feasibility Phase of a Mine Project
- Figure 9-4: Overall Segregation of Various Waste Rock Units Based on their ARD Potential and Physical Characteristics
- Figure 9-5: Typical Environmental Management Model
- Figure 9-6: The Cycle for Developing and Implementing ARD Management Plans in each Life Cycle Stage
- Figure 9-7: Mine Life Cycle Development and Implementation of ARD Management Plans
10.0 Acid Rock Drainage Communication and Consulting
List of Tables
- Table 10-1: Assessment Tool: Indicators of Negative Engagement with Stakeholders
- Table 10-2: Sources with More Information on Principles, Approaches, and Techniques for Communication and Consultation with Stakeholders
List of Figures
- Figure 10-1: Chapter 10 Layout/Road Map
- Figure 10-2: Types of stakeholder engagement and the intensity with which people are engaged (IFC, 2007). Engagement with stakeholders about an ARD situation under different scenarios is indicated on the figure
- Figure 10-3: IAP2’s Public Participation Spectrum
- Figure 10-4: A notice board in a mining community in Ghana where materials are on permanent display. ARD monitoring results can be displayed in this way, and constantly updated to show progress